If you don’t know where, lots of websites will help you, even Google Maps.

Don’t assume that the polls will come true even if you skip voting. Vote.

If you’re still undecided (have you been living on Mars, in a cave, under a rock, with your eyes closed and your ears covered for the past 2 years) or think the candidates are “the same,” I urge you to check out their websites: BarackObama.com and JohnMcCain.com and read about their positions.

I assure you, they are very different.

As David Sedaris said, it’s like being offered the chicken dinner or a plate of shit with broken glass in it, and asking how the chicken is cooked. No matter which side you’re on.

The following does not constitute rigorous proof. Just observation and conjecture.

For an experiment, I went to Google News and searched for “mccain” “palin” “obama” and “biden”, all separately, and just looked at the total results. (I looked on the second page because Google’s duplicate-finding algorithms usually seem to pare down results by the time you get to page 2.)

Here are the results:

• obama — 433.631
• mccain — 416,804
• biden — 86,164
• palin — 202,033

Obama and McCain are fairly even (unsurprising, since most articles that mention one mention the other). What shocks me is that Sarah Palin, who almost no one in the country had heard of until two months ago, has already caught up to half of the candidates, who have been on the trail for a year and a half.

Unless Michael Palin has been making tons of news, lately?

She’s got two and a half times the press of Joe Biden, who’s been a US Senator for 35 years, so probably has some old mentions in there.

We see a similar trend in the regular Google search:

• obama — 206,000,000
• mccain — 146,000,000
• biden — 37,900,000
• palin — 107,000,000

Here I attribute the difference between Obama and McCain to Obama’s lead among young voters. But Palin has even more momentum here, half of Obama and two-thirds of McCain. (I re-ran this search several times, because Google said it was customizing my results based on my recent queries.)

Why?

McCain picked an ambitious, photogenic campaigner. He, on the other hand, is an occasionally ornery, but usually soft-spoken old man. Barack Obama is a well-spoken Black man with a thousand-watt smile. Biden is the soft-spoken older man on that ticket.

Unfortunately for Senator McCain, he also picked an unknown, inexperienced Governor who usually sounds like a high school student who didn’t read the book, and looks like Tina Fey. Comic. Gold.

I realize that picking someone less exciting that John McCain may have been difficult, but picking someone much more interesting, and not in a particularly good way, was definitely a bad choice. Yes she energized the base. She also energized every comedian and reporter. So much so that they forgot about John McCain.

They are “voting for the chick.”

For disclosure, I only identify as a Democrat because they’re as far left as I can get and still have a realistic chance of winning. I’m roughly in the left side of the British Liberal Democrat party.

But, if I was a Republican, I would be angry about this. As a liberal, it’s just funny.

We can build a “Victims of Socialism” monument, too, for completeness. These are mostly people who suffer through the UK’s sorely underfunded health care system.

Of course, your typical American history class, and hence your typical American adult, draws no distinction between communism, a centrally-controlled economy in which all citizens are equal owners, and an authoritarian dictatorship, such as, for instance, Russia under Stalin.

The question of whether or not communism can succeed on any meaningful scale is a long-standing one, which has been the source of much debate. But anyone with a clear understanding of civics can understand that these people were not victims of an abstract economic theory, but of corrupt and brutal leaders.