On Monday, I deleted my Facebook account. A day before I hit the button, I posted a note letting people know where they could find me online if they wanted, and promising more of an explanation: here it is.
I’m a control freak. I run my own web servers, mail server, IRC server, CI server, SVN server, so I have control. If I could afford the colocation, I’d run them on my own hardware. Hell, if I could afford the bandwidth, I’d install a rack in my closet.
But most importantly, I want control of the data. My data.
Facebook recently made two changes to their service that signal a significant and frightening shift in their position on data—specifically who owns and has control over data. They automatically linked interests to public pages, and they introduced “Social Plugins and Instant Personalization.”
Until now, even if I decided to be permissive with my data, I still felt like I was in control of them on Facebook. With the new “connections” feature, as the EFF says, “Facebook users now face a Hobson’s choice between the new Connections and no listed interests at all.” I no longer have the option to share my data with the subset of people I know: either I share them with everyone, in particular advertisers, or I don’t post data at all.
I mention advertisers because they are most likely consumer of the vast quantities of aggregate data Facebook is creating with the new connections feature. Surely no individual will gain anything from knowing that several million people share their interest in Lady Gaga.
And until now, I had the ability to whitelist the applications with which I shared data. I routinely hit a wall as I browsed my friends’ activity, where I would be asked to choose between sharing my data with an application or not seeing its content. More often than not, I chose not to share, and live without the content.
This makes three things about the Instant Personalization onerous: the presumptive sharing with third parties; the shift to a blacklist, where I must specifically opt out; and the willingness to share data even if I have opted out in general.
- Facebook has decided that Yelp, Microsoft’s Docs.com, and Pandora should have access to my data. I was not part of that decision.
- If I opt out and turn off Instant Personalization, Facebook will still share my data with these third parties, if my friends choose to use their services. Again, I am not part of that decision.
- In order to prevent Facebook from sharing my data with them, I have to manually block each application. That’s annoying, but manageable when it’s just three applications, but it’s not scalable.
This is all scary. Facebook could not have made these changes if they honestly believed that I own my data, and they have access with my permission. These changes indicate that Facebook believes they own my data, and will do with them what they please, unless I go out of my way to ask them not to.
I’ve always had mixed feelings about the protest groups that form on Facebook after every major change. Sure, Facebook staff are more likely to notice a Facebook group with 100,000 members than 100,000 individual blog posts, but in our socio-economic system, the real way to signal displeasure to a business is to stop using that business—the online equivalent of “voting with your wallet.”
So, like a few others, I’m taking my data and going home.
I’m willing to share my data with Facebook as long as I ultimately feel in control. It’s possible that I’ll come back to Facebook if they’re willing to not only fix these particular issues but also make it clear that I am ultimately in control of my own data. That doesn’t seem likely.
What do you think about Facebook, these changes, and your data? Let me know in the comments.
Facebook served as an aggregator of my activity online, and now all those aggregated feeds are alone and disparate again. I’m looking at turning jamessocol.com into a lifestream/aggregator to make up for it. I looked at Planet Venus but wasn’t thrilled with it. If you know of any cool software for that, let me know. Otherwise I’ll write something and play with things like Redis, Node.js, Tornado, and/or other neat stuff.
And yes, I know Tornado is from Facebook.
Matěj Cepl
6 May 2010 at 6:42 am
me too
Tony
6 May 2010 at 7:24 am
While I was in damn near the same boat a week ago, I think facebook made a few changes to the privacy settings since the EFF article was posted. If you look here http://screencast.com/t/ZGFiZmY0 you can see that we actually have control over those things. The one thing that still seems public is when you go to a public page and click the ‘like’ button it adds it under the Other section on interests and shows up publicly.
As far as friends sharing your info on other sites they have a page where you can configure that too http://screencast.com/t/MjI1MTQxY so I’m pretty sure the only information they can access is that which is publicly available.
Roy
6 May 2010 at 8:35 am
I agree. I was a Facebook user since April 2004, but this time they have gone too far. I “voted with my wallet” and deleted my account.
Matt Brubeck
6 May 2010 at 9:19 am
But can Tornado scale to handle 1 user?
Rafe K.
6 May 2010 at 9:55 am
Nice article. You are definitely not wrong. It’s one thing to have these data-sharing policies for profit; it’s quite another to believe you can expose what was once private data without considering how customers will react. People will vote with their feet. But then, they probably believe so much of their own hype they think we’re all drinking the company koolaid.
I signed up for FB a long time ago just because it seemed to be “necessary”, but I never interacted. After this policy change, I revisited my account to find my birthday displayed to the public – this and my email, the only info I had actually given. But wait, didn’t I give them my email password too? I wonder if Zuckerberg enjoyed perusing my email? I do hope they all enjoyed my spam.
Count me among those who will now be closing their FB accounts. It’s not that I can’t handle this policy shift, or the rube-goldbergian obstacle course they set up to exploit the user; it’s that I don’t trust what FB will do tomorrow when my back is turned. They have declared their priorities, which do not align with mine as a user, and so i will happily find the next Friendster or Linkedin or whatever it is. On the Web, like Hollywood, the question isn’t what have you done, but what have you done lately.
Somebody needs to pop FB’s groupthink bubble. You know who else doesn’t believe in internet privacy? The CCP in Beijing. Nice business model – for the powers-that-be, and happy imbeciles. For the rest of us, yeah, not so much.
James
6 May 2010 at 10:51 am
@Tony: That’s good to see, but I’m going to wait until the next big change before I consider going back. This cycle of “go too far, piss people off, step back” is getting old. Like I said, Connections and Instant Personalization couldn’t have happened this way if they thought I owned my data. We’ll see what the next big “feature” brings.
@Matt: I hear it can scale all the way to 5 or 6! I know if I go with something like Tornado it will probably be down all the time. I’m also vaguely considering something like a Django app with a node.js/redis-powered comet stream on top of it.
Tony
6 May 2010 at 2:06 pm
Sometimes Facebook makes me feel dirty and/or angry but too many of my friends have turned to it as their sole form of communication and planning. I’m kinda stuck at this point.
Havvy
6 May 2010 at 9:01 pm
*Clap* *Clap* You found a capitalistic agreement useful, but due to this change, found it bad. Instead of complaining to the government, you complained using your channels and left the agreement.
Dave Dash
6 May 2010 at 11:58 pm
Thanks for having balls and deleting it, rather than deactivating it.
James
8 May 2010 at 12:51 am
@Tony: I’m fortunate that most things I actually care about come via other channels, like email, IRC, or Twitter, these days. There are a couple of people I only really talk to on Facebook, and that kind of sucks.
Dave: Why thank you.
Playing with the Real-Time Web | Coffee on the Keyboard
8 May 2010 at 7:58 pm
[...] I left Facebook, I’ve been working on a little project to take its place as an aggregator, or a central hub [...]
l.m.orchard
10 May 2010 at 10:48 pm
For what it’s worth, I built feeds.mozilla.com on top of Planet Venus. Does a wonderful job of chewing through large numbers of RSS/Atom feeds on a periodic basis, but isn’t what you’d call “realtime”.
James
11 May 2010 at 12:29 am
@Les: Planet Venus looked very capable, I just wasn’t excited about it. Plus, why not take the chance to play with some new toys?